[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Spacer
SEARCH
Spacer
NEWS CENTER
Spacer

December 2007

Home page
Current Issue
Past issues
Daily Headlines
Virginia Ideas
Editor's Blog
Spacer
TOP FEATURES
Spacer
Business Calendar
Virginia's Wealthiest
List of Leaders
Fantastic 50
Legal Elite
Super CPAs
Maritime Guide
Business Guide
Spacer
MARKET RESEARCH
Spacer
Regional Guides
Spacer
CLASSIFIEDS
Spacer
Jobs
VACommercial
Executive Services
Featured Ads
Spacer
CONTACT US
Spacer
Contact Us
Advertise With us
Planning Calendar
Subscribe
Spacer
News & Features


Virginia's steel mills reflect industry's new image

by Brett Lieberman
for Virginia Business

April 2005

Plumes of smelly, toxin-filled smoke waft from bellowing furnaces. Young men turn old before their time as they turn iron ore and coke into girders, steel beams and fenders. That’s the traditional image of the steel industry — gritty steel mills in Rust Belt states such as Ohio or Pennsylvania. It’s not an industry that you would expect to find in Virginia, a tobacco state now gaining a reputation as a high-tech center.

READER RESOURCES
Web Pointers: For more information
Roanoke Electric Steel Corp.
Steel Manufacturers Association
TXI Chaparral Steel
American Iron and Steel Institute

READER REACTION

Feedback: Comment on this story

But the industry is here — at Roanoke Electric Steel Corp. in Roanoke and at TXI Chaparral Steel in Dinwiddie County near Petersburg — and the reality of modern steelmaking is very different from its outdated image. “People don’t think about Virginia as a steel state,” says Thomas Danjczek, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association and a 30-year industry veteran. “But in Virginia, we make probably a million and a half tons of steel a year.”

The quiet success of Virginia’s steel sector proves a shining example of how the industry has changed. Gone are the enormous, inefficient mills that polluted the environment and consumed large amounts of energy and raw materials. Taking their place are smaller and more technically sophisticated “mini-mills,” which manufacture steel bars used in construction.

Mini-mills were once bit players, but they have become the industry standard in the United States and Europe. They control 50.4 percent of the U.S. market, up from 10 percent in the 1960s. Only in countries like China, where labor and energy costs are low and environmental impact is of less concern, are old-style, integrated mills still being planned. “It’s really a whole different paradigm from your father’s steel mill,” Danjczek says.

Instead of using raw metals such as iron ore or nickel, mini-mills are fed a diet of scrap metal. The recycling of steel scrap plays an important role in the conservation of energy because steel produced from melted scrap requires much less energy than the production of steel products from iron ore.

Mini-mills are more efficient, too. New technology allows them to produce steel at less than one man-hour per ton, compared to three man-hours at traditional mills.

“The steel mini-mills were designed to serve a more regional market, resulting in less volume produced in a single location,” says T. Joe Crawford, president and chief operating officer of Roanoke Electric Steel, which turns scrap metal into angles, rounds, flats, beams and other steel parts. “The process of melting scrap metal in electric arc furnaces is a much cleaner process than the blast furnace process.”

Such efficiencies are part of the success story behind Roanoke Electric Steel, which posted its 185th consecutive quarterly dividend in February. The company has invested in some of the newest equipment in the industry despite recently weathering some of the toughest times in its 50-year history. “We have done everything we can to make sure our facilities and equipment are state-of-the-art and as good as anybody out there,” says Crawford, noting more than $170 million in capital expansion between 1986 and 2000.

Roanoke Electric Steel is poised to spend even more money on upgrades in the next few years thanks to a new five-year, $85 million credit arrangement and an increasingly rosy outlook for an industry that just a few years ago was struggling.

The renewed optimism at Roanoke Electric Steel stems from a record-breaking year in 2004, when the company turned the previous year’s $3 million loss into a $30.4 million profit. “The market consensus is that the steel industry will enjoy, at the least, several more years of good results, and we plan to enjoy them as well,” Crawford says.

The industry’s rebound was spurred on by increased demand for steel for auto parts manufacturing in China, which single-handedly absorbed much of the worldwide glut. Last year, it imported 3 million tons of steel. That drove up the cost of steel as well as raw materials’ prices.

The parent company of TXI Chaparral, which employs about 500 people at its Dinwiddie mini-mill, apparently is taking advantage of the good times. Dallas-based Texas Industries Inc. announced plans in December to spin off its steel business by this summer. While company officials could not be reached for comment, some industry analysts speculated the new steel company could become an acquisition target.

Boom-and-bust cycles are common in the steel industry. While the stock price of Roanoke Electric Steel is near historic highs, memories of times when the industry was scraping bottom are still fresh in the minds of company officials. The three years before 2004 were difficult, says Crawford, 49, who has been with the company 27 years.

Indeed, the steel business saw one of its weakest periods from 2000 to 2003. In addition to a national recession and a decline in business after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the industry faced a flood of cheap steel imports that led President Bush to approve short-term tariffs. About 40 percent of the companies in the industry went into bankruptcy, folded or consolidated with other companies. (The consolidation trend is expected to continue, leaving the industry in the hands of fewer companies.) During this time the number of members in the Steel Manufacturers Association shrank to 38 from 58 even as the industry continued to produce the same tonnage of steel. “This one was more prolonged and more severe than any we had ever seen,” says Crawford.

Roanoke Electric Steel got through this lean period without laying off any of its 1,600 workers, 550 of whom work in Roanoke. (The company has subsidiaries in Salem, Montvale, Rocky Mount in Virginia, plus other operations in West Virginia, South Carolina, Tennessee and Ohio.) “We just hunkered down and tried to do the best given the conditions that were out there,” says Crawford.

The company cut production, reduced shifts and delayed some capital investments, including up to $12 million planned for pollution control and waste disposal equipment at its Roanoke mill, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing. Nonetheless, the company still posted losses in 2002 and 2003, its first losses since the company’s founding in 1955. “Maintaining a strong financial condition, a conservative growth strategy, continued investment in equipment and technology, and selected strategic acquisitions have enabled Roanoke Electric Steel to survive the bad times and excel in the good times,” Crawford says.

A conservative management style that demands a strong balance sheet has been a key part of the company’s philosophy. Faced with competitors such as industry giant Nucor Corp., which has $11.4 billion in revenue compared to Roanoke Electric Steel’s $479.3 million, the smaller company can ill afford to be overextended. “We have to be smarter…they have more buying power,” Crawford says bluntly. “We need to position ourselves to be able to weather these ups and downs.

One way the company has done this is by vertically integrating and creating a market for its products. Two wholly-owned fabricating subsidiaries purchase about 25 percent of the angles and rounds produced by the company to manufacture floor and ceiling supports for industrial buildings. About 65 percent of the company’s production is sold to steel service centers, middlemen that sell to steel users. The rest is sold to equipment manufacturers for products that include truck trailers and snow plows.

(A Roanoke Electric Steel competitor, Gerdau Ameristeel, plans to build a fabrication plant in King George County. The plant, which will employ 50 workers, will bend steel products to customers’ specifications.)

While Crawford and industry insiders are optimistic about steel’s near-term future, some Wall Street analysts are raising red flags about uncertainties behind those projections. CIBC World Markets downgraded the sector saying that steel pricing has probably peaked and that 2004’s performances are unlikely to be duplicated. Prudential dropped the industry rating to unfavorable from neutral over concerns about higher costs for raw materials.

But as Danjczek describes it, the biggest worry on everybody’s mind is “China, China, China.” The rebounding U.S. economy gets some of the credit for last year’s stellar industry performance. Yet the greatest influence was China’s insatiable demand.

China’s demand continues to drive up costs, for scrap and other raw materials as well as steel. The country has gone from being a buyer of steel to being a seller, exporting 1 million tons in October. “If their demand lessens, it could cause a flood of low-market steel to flood the world,” Danjczek warns shortly before leaving on a trip to China. “It’s not clear what’s going to happen there.”

Whether it’s cheap Chinese exports, a weak U.S. dollar or lack of domestic demand, even the most bullish steel people know the next meltdown may not be too far off. With no plans to sell out or consolidate, Roanoke Electric Steel’s strategy will be pretty much the same: stay lean, hunker down and hope any downturn is brief.


Virginia Business Online | Contact Us | E-mail the editor

©2007, Media General Operations Inc., publisher of Virginia Business.
Use of this website is subject to certain terms and conditions.