Virginia Business
Spacer
SEARCH
Spacer
NEWS CENTER
Spacer

December 2007

Home page
Current Issue
Past issues
Daily Headlines
Virginia Ideas
Editor's Blog
Spacer
TOP FEATURES
Spacer
Business Calendar
Virginia's Wealthiest
List of Leaders
Fantastic 50
Legal Elite
Super CPAs
Maritime Guide
Business Guide
Spacer
MARKET RESEARCH
Spacer
Regional Guides
Spacer
CLASSIFIEDS
Spacer
Jobs
VACommercial
Executive Services
Featured Ads
Spacer
CONTACT US
Spacer
Contact Us
Advertise With us
Planning Calendar
Subscribe
Spacer

Return to Virginia Business - November 2004

Virginia Ideas

More companies uncovering fraud while expanding efforts to stem the threat

by John Veihmeyer
For Virginia Business
November 2004

Companies are uncovering fraudulent activities in their operations with new vigor and vigilance. This aggressive stance was spawned by the well-publicized financial-reporting scandals and collapse of a number of major corporations, events that shook financial markets and investor confidence.

A recent survey by KPMG, the audit, tax and advisory firm, reveals that reported fraud is on the rise. But the survey — which polled more than 450 companies, and state and federal agencies — also shows that organizations have countered this threat with new detection and preventive measures. They are optimistic that their efforts will lead to a decline in fraud.

The heightened awareness of fraud is a positive step. A danger exists, however, that misplaced optimism over current efforts could lead to complacency. That, in turn, could result in reduced anti-fraud efforts and increased vulnerability. So the threat of fraud remains a significant hazard that could ruin a company’s finances, damage its brand and reputation and send it into a death spiral of government investigations, loss of market capitalization and bankruptcy. Continued vigilance is the key for companies in maintaining their momentum and building upon success.

The KPMG survey found that 75 percent of respondents reported that they uncovered fraud in their organizations in the past year, compared with 62 percent in a 1998 survey. While these results might point to an increase in fraud, our experience suggests that a greater sensitivity to fraud is a better explanation. The percentage has grown as companies have increased their efforts to detect fraud and to act decisively to prevent it.

This change has occurred in many areas of business. Many companies have revisited or instituted codes of conduct that set forth their commitment to integrity and set up reporting channels such as employee hotlines for reporting fraud or misconduct.

Implementation of anti-fraud measures has been especially significant in heavily regulated industries such as banking, finance, insurance and health care. One local bank recently hired experienced compliance personnel, revised its procedures for opening accounts and monitoring transactions, implemented companywide training for employees and integrated anti-fraud and compliance controls as it upgraded IT systems.

In another example, a multinational company with many subsidiaries has set the tone from the top, instituting stricter controls and personal accountability to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. These controls include enhanced procedures to ensure compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

The KPMG survey also indicates that businesses are taking steps in their accounting practices in response to fraud. Nowhere is this response as dramatic as in the implementation of internal fraud-detection controls. More than three-quarters of companies surveyed — 77 percent — say they use internal controls as the chief means for uncovering fraud, compared with 51 percent five years ago.

Another finding saw a sharp increase in the use of internal audits — from 43 percent in 1998 to 65 percent in 2003 — as companies upgraded their detection capabilities to address concerns about fraud. In addition, they are responding to suspicions and allegations of fraud by starting formal investigations — 98 percent of survey respondents say they did so, compared with 94 percent five years ago.

Not only are companies more aware of fraud, but many also intend to take further action. Some 74 percent said they plan to launch anti-fraud initiatives in response to Sarbanes-Oxley, driven not only by stiffer regulations and penalties but also by a desire to practice good business ethics. What’s not so encouraging is that more than one in five companies (22 percent) said they do not plan to implement new controls and that 36 percent incurred $1 million or more in costs because of fraud, up from 21 percent just five years earlier.

In the future, many more organizations than in previous surveys believe that fraud will decline. Forty-three percent of the responding corporate and government executives predicted a decrease in fraud in the next 12 months, and just 7 percent expected an increase. This optimism is based largely on the respondents’ belief in the effectiveness of their anti-fraud measures. In reality, however, misconduct is a pervasive problem, requiring companies to constantly improve their methods for detecting, preventing and investigating fraud.

John Veihmeyer is managing partner of KPMG’s Washington, D.C., area offices and is managing partner of the firm’s audit and risk advisory practice in the mid-Atlantic region, including Virginia.

Return to Virginia Business - November 2004


Virginia Business Online | Contact Us | E-mail the editor

©2007, Media General Operations Inc., publisher of Virginia Business.
Use of this website is subject to certain terms and conditions.