Mold - the new asbestos?
When insurers fear
big claims, contractors pay the price
Related
story:
- Insurance brokers in Virginia
by
Brett Lieberman
Virginia Business
May
2004
Mold
can wreak havoc in more places than the shower. Just
ask homebuilder Ron Gwaltney. During his three years
in business, he’s never filed a claim with his
insurer. So he was stunned late last year to find out
that his general-liability insurance premiums would
double to $10,000 per year. A different underwriter
offered a cheaper policy but still demanded a 50 percent
rate hike.
Gwaltney isn’t alone. Builders and contractors
across Virginia are learning that insurance companies
either want hefty rate hikes or have stopped offering
coverage. Zurich North America, for example, which used
to write most homebuilders’ policies, now writes
none.
The problem, say contractors and insurers, is a growing
number of claims for construction defects, especially
mold-related claims and lawsuits. While molds occur
naturally in the environment, those microscopic spores
— given the right conditions — can cause
millions in property damage and in some cases pose a
health risk. In 2002, U.S. insurers paid more than $3
billion in mold-related claims, up from $1.3 billion
paid in 2001, according to the Insurance Information
Institute.
Even builders like Gwaltney who haven’t made any
insurance claims are finding that insurers don’t
want to take the risk. Mold claims typically costs $15,000
to $30,000 but can reach $100,000 for residential repairs
and into the millions on commercial projects.
So far, most mold cases have been in Texas. Nearly $4
billion has been paid there in the past three years.
The number of claims and lawsuits is growing in other
areas, too, including California and Florida. Just last
month, Lou Ferrigno, the former bodybuilder and “Incredible
Hulk” television star, settled a $250,000 suit
in Los Angeles after an inspector allegedly failed to
properly locate and repair a leak, which caused damage
resulting in mold growth.
Generally, mold claims stem from conditions involving
moisture, in which spores grow unchecked. Carlton Gill
Jr., an independent insurance agent with W.T. Chapin
in Newport News, says one of his underwriters paid $750,000
to settle a claim after ductwork — left outside
a home in North Carolina prior to installation —
spread mold spores and sickened two elderly women. The
contractor ended up buying the home for about $1 million.
“Even though these things aren’t happening
all that frequently, when they do they are pretty dramatic
in terms of the dollar pay-out the insurance companies
are having to make,” says Gill.
Faced with rising insurance premiums and uncertainty
over whether commercial carriers will remain in the
market, the Tidewater Builders Association has started
offering a self-insurance policy with rates up to 25
percent lower than commercial insurers. The group’s
leaders think they might be the only local trade group
in the country to do so. So far, 16 builders have signed
up. Gwaltney was the first. “The reality is the
insurance is necessary,” he says. “You’ve
just got to have it.”
There might be a need, yet few commercial insurers want
a share of what they view as a potentially risky market.
“There was a big void that we were hearing from
our members,” says John “Chip” Iuliano
III, the association president. Iuliano is still insured
through Nationwide Insurance, which continues to write
policies in Virginia, although he’s bracing for
bad news.
The Tidewater group is able to offer lower prices because
it does not have the national exposure of other insurers,
and it does not have shareholders expecting profits.
In addition, it has minimized its risk by requiring
builders to have written agreements with subcontractors
to make them responsible for their work. Buyers must
also agree to resolve disputes through binding arbitration.
Local agents write the policies and receive a commission
as they would from other underwriters.
The Tidewater builders’ program isn’t necessarily
a cheaper option. While the rates are lower, builders
are required to buy home warranties. Rates vary based
on a builder’s sales, but typical premiums run
from $2,500 to $25,000 and offer coverage up to $1 million
per claim or a $2 million aggregate. While he’s
not realizing any savings, Gwaltney says the warranty
provides a value that he can pass along to homebuyers.
Another way the construction industry is trying to cope
with the mold problem is through new products, such
as sub-floors, that keep mold and mildew out. They’re
costly, though, and homebuyers may not want to foot
the bill. “Many of these things are not things
you can turn a switch on and they work,” says
Gwaltney. “The buying public will not see these
things.”
The general liability program, which grew out of the
builders association’s experience with its five-year-old
workers’ compensation program, is still in its
infancy. Only $200,000 in premiums has been paid so
far. A planned marketing blitz aims at reaching $1 million
in policies by year’s end.
The impact of mold claims is hitting certain trades
especially hard, including heating and air conditioning
contractors and plumbers, because they deal with ductwork
and potentially leaky pipes that could lead to a mold
outbreak. “Those guys and the plumbers are in
the most hazardous category. They don’t stand
a chance of getting a renewal,” says Gill. The
policies they are able to find typically exclude claims
from mold or fungal growth, which leaves them exposed
to potentially costly out-of-pocket expenses. Another
option is buying a pollution-insurance add-on, but premiums
for a contractor with only three employees can start
at $10,000 a year.
Much as in the debate over rising medical malpractice
rates, there’s a lot of rhetoric and blame to
go around about the costs and health effects of mold
claims.
Fanning the fires of mold litigation, say insurers,
are lawsuit-happy attorneys and publicity from high-profile
cases, such as television personality Ed McMahon’s
$20 million suit for faulty mold remediation. Insurers
say some attorneys have a “mold is gold”
mindset and see it as the new asbestos, and a source
of big payouts.
“It’s been a big issue for a number of years
and it’s certainly growing,” says California
attorney Alexander Robertson IV, who might be dubbed
the king of mold suits. He is currently handling about
700 mold-related lawsuits and helped McMahon reach a
$7.2 million settlement. McMahon sued his insurer, insurance
adjusters and cleanup contractors for $20 million, blaming
them for painting over mold after a broken pipe flooded
his den. McMahon and his wife said they became seriously
ill and their sheepdog developed respiratory problems
and died before the McMahons moved out.
Another Robertson client, Erin Brockovich, who was made
famous by the movie bearing her name, has become a crusader
on the mold problem since claiming that construction
flaws and high mold levels were to blame for sickening
her and her 9-year-old daughter.
The insurance industry maintains that most mold is a
maintenance issue and rarely poses serious health issues,
although many people are allergic to molds. In the United
States, there are more than 100,000 species of mold
and at least 1,000 variants are common. Caught early,
the industry says, simple bleach and water can eliminate
mold damage. “What’s happening is that mold
is becoming such a highly charged emotional issue,”
says Eric Goldberg, the assistant general counsel at
the American Insurance Association. Homeowners’
fears of catching airborne illnesses are being fueled
by flawed science, he says. “Because there’s
no science, the science often gets made in the courtroom.”
Insurers are hoping an anticipated National Academy
of Sciences study will find that mold is not a serious
health threat and will provide ammunition to fight mold
claims, but existing research so far has not supported
industry claims. “Our hope is that if the National
Academy of Sciences study comes out the right way, that
will go a long way to reducing litigation costs,”
says Goldberg, who predicts insurers would return to
the market quickly.
If not, many builders are being squeezed by higher costs
for materials and labor and may not be around when insurers
come calling again. Richmond homebuilder John Nolde
sums up the situation like this: “We’re
getting to the point where it’s like the doctors
and their liability … it’s getting prohibitive.”
Return
to Virginia Business - May 2004
|