Virginia Business
Spacer
SEARCH
Spacer
NEWS CENTER
Spacer

December 2007

Home page
Current Issue
Past issues
Daily Headlines
Virginia Ideas
Editor's Blog
Spacer
TOP FEATURES
Spacer
Business Calendar
Virginia's Wealthiest
List of Leaders
Fantastic 50
Legal Elite
Super CPAs
Maritime Guide
Business Guide
Spacer
MARKET RESEARCH
Spacer
Regional Guides
Spacer
CLASSIFIEDS
Spacer
Jobs
VACommercial
Executive Services
Featured Ads
Spacer
CONTACT US
Spacer
Contact Us
Advertise With us
Planning Calendar
Subscribe
Spacer

Return to Virginia Business - March 2003

TOP keeps shipments on time
Norfolk Southern uses advanced systems to unsnarl rail lines

by Garry Kranz
for Virginia Business
March 2003

Snow falls furiously as Norfolk Southern train No. 236 pulls away from Roanoke en route to Norfolk. A messy wintry mix has caught the crew by surprise. As the black locomotive crosses a trestle, no cars are traveling on U.S. 460 below. Staying put because of weather, however, is not an option for Norfolk Southern Corp. if it wants to execute its new business strategy of upgrading its efficiency and on-time deliveries.

Engineer Wayne Gray and conductor Wayne Weeks are unperturbed by the squall. They chat amiably with their boss, John Eubank, road foreman of engineers. Weeks needles Eubank, who is getting off in Crewe, midway between Roanoke and Norfolk. “You sure you don’t want to ride all the way to Norfolk with us? We’ll be done in another 12 hours. Then we can go out on the town.” Eubank, a fourth-generation railroad man, flashes a grin. “I couldn’t keep up with your nightlife,” he tells the 59-year-old Weeks, and the two men share a hearty laugh.

In time, Gray throws the throttle wide open and the General Electric Dash-9 locomotive leading the high-priority inter-modal train clips along at the maximum track speed of 60 mph. Eubank, a 32-year Norfolk Southern veteran, hollers “Clear” as the locomotive approaches each signal crossing. The 236 is ahead of schedule by more than two hours, which is good news for Eubank. It means he won’t be getting back to Roanoke in the middle of the night.

It’s even better news for Norfolk Southern customers who are waiting on the train’s 4,400-ton cargo of chemicals, car parts and consumer products. The timeliness of the 236 illustrates one of Norfolk Southern’s most critical business goals for the next decade: to use technology-driven improvement processes to make train shipments as reliable as daybreak. The aim is to win over new customers while keeping existing customers happy.

Supporting such goals is a comprehensive new operating plan, developed after two years of analysis using predictive-modeling software and other technology tools. Norfolk Southern also is using technology to offer fee-based logistics services to customers — even non-rail ones — for inventory control, supply chain management and warehousing. Combined, Norfolk Southern is banking these tech-based approaches will help siphon business away from the railroads’ long-time competitor: the trucking industry.

Railroads traditionally have focused on running trains on time, which hasn’t always equated to delivering shipments on time. To combat this, two years ago Norfolk Southern began using technology to revamp its train network, which carried 2.8 million carloads last year. Known as the Thoroughbred Operating Plan, or TOP, the initiative was designed to squeeze more efficiency out of the rail company’s 22,000-mile-long network of track, which covers 22 states in the eastern U.S. as well as Ontario, Canada. TOP focuses on increasing train velocity, eliminating chokepoints and streamlining terminal processes.

One important objective of TOP is to grab some of the business that has been lost to the trucking industry. In 2001, for instance, the U.S. trucking industry accounted for revenue of $330 billion. Railroads, by contrast, pulled in a combined $35 billion. Norfolk Southern hopes to use better operating ratios and improved on-time shipment performance to increase its tonnage of intermodal freight, which refers to products shipped via rail and coordinated with other transportation modes like truck and oceangoing vessels. “What we wanted was to get the entire network functioning at a much higher level, not only to take out costs but be able to attack the truck market,” says Don Seale, the company’s vice president of merchandise marketing.

TOP was developed in conjunction with MultiModal Applied Systems, a Princeton, N.J.-based company that provides software and consulting services to railroads. Using Multi Rail, a service design and operations planning software developed by MultiModal, Norfolk Southern used actual waybills to forecast demand over a typical seven-day period. Waybills provide an accurate database of traffic variation. Facts such as car handling at terminals, seasons, and other demand spikes also were part of the equation. By looking at the subsequent data, Norfolk Southern planners were able to pinpoint chokepoints and use computer simulation to test new routes before making a single change to the track. MultiModal was hired based on its past successes. In 1999, it designed and implemented a new operating plan for Canadian Pacific Railway that was credited with helping produce record revenue growth.

Another goal of the program was to help Norfolk Southern get back on track after its botched takeover, along with rival railroad CSX Corp. of Richmond, of Conrail in 1999. The two railroads had such serious problems executing the takeover that both firms saw their stock prices cut in half. Some of the problems were linked to dividing up Conrail territory piecemeal, with both railroads essentially splitting pieces of the lucrative northeastern routes. However, neither company had fully analyzed their systems to eliminate redundancies and other delays. A larger problem was the culture of railroads, which focused primarily on getting trains out of terminals on time. “Shippers don’t care if trains run on time. All they care about is that their car gets there on time,” says Jason Kuehn, vice president of consulting for MultiModal.

TOP uses 250 new train schedules and routings for shipments of chemicals, agricultural and consumer goods, paper and forest products, metals and construction materials and automotive parts. The new plan reduces or eliminates handlings at Norfolk Southern’s 13 major classification yards, where cars are organized into new blocks of trains, and at more than 200 regional and local yards. According to Norfolk Southern, about 75 percent of its merchandise customers should see improvements in transit times. “Every time you handle a car in a terminal, it costs money,” says David Layman, Norfolk Southern’s head of dispatchers.

And it costs time. A rule of thumb in the industry is that each terminal eliminated saves 24 hours in transit time. By being able to get more trains to their destinations quicker, a railroad theoretically will be able to have more cars available for other shippers. That increased capacity would lead to increased revenue. It also cuts down on the potential for mishandlings and other problems.

Some hump yards, where cars get switched, were shut down by Norfolk Southern, including one in Knoxville, Tenn., and another near Pittsburgh, Penn. Another hump yard near Harrisburg, Penn. — it once was the largest in the world — was reopened to provide a more direct switching stop for freight heading to Baltimore and Washington, D.C. Norfolk Southern inherited the facility when it acquired parts of Conrail. Previously, that same freight would have gone either north to Allentown, Penn., or west to Pittsburgh, before heading to Baltimore.
TOP also resulted in some new, more direct routes being drawn, including one for carrying merchandise freight between Mooresville, N.C., to Elkhardt, Ind., and eventually to Chicago. Those shipments now arrive as many as 48 hours earlier, according to Norfolk Southern.

The improvements have some customers beaming. “It’s been an incredible turnaround,” says Bill Kirk, president and chief executive officer of Associated Asphalt Co. in Roanoke, which ships liquid asphalt from the Midwest to Virginia and the Carolinas. Kirk says his transit times have been cut by more than half, from 13 days to just six days.

Seale says the new operating plan helped improve train speeds 32 percent in 2001. Dwell time, defined as the length of time a train sits idle in a yard — and therefore isn’t being used to haul freight — fell 30 percent. Also, cars on line per day dropped 19 percent, from 226,000 in 2000 to roughly 184,000 in 2001. At the same time, revenue per car day — the average daily revenue produced by its entire fleet — jumped 17 percent.

Even so, Peter Swan, a former executive with CSX Corp. and now a business logistics professor at Pennsylvania State University, says that despite improvements such as TOP, other problems aren’t being addressed. One is making sure the right cars make the right train at the right time. Railroad companies are faced with unpredictable demand from shippers, and often have no control over when they might receive time-sensitive goods that need to be shipped. “Norfolk Southern is guaranteeing they’re going to run the trains on time every day. As long as on any particular day they don’t get too many cars going to a particular location, or too few cars (making it economically unfeasible) to run a train, everything’s fine,” says Swan. “But if you don’t know what you’re going to get from one day to the next, running the trains on time doesn’t guarantee that the proper cars will go on the proper trains.”

Seale says TOP is designed to prevent just such incidents from happening by enabling Norfolk Southern to simulate how trains will be built. Many industries, including the automotive sector, have gone to just-in-time delivery of parts and supplies, so timing and precise delivery is critical. Norfolk Southern has much to lose if such missteps were to regularly occur, since the rail company carries more than 90 percent of all automotive parts in the eastern U.S. In fact, a second phase of TOP aims to improve coordination between over-the-road freight trains and local delivery trains, which carry goods back and forth over shorter, more intermediate routes. In some cases, Norfolk Southern offers money-back guarantees if it does not meet deadlines set by the customer, even if other railroads are involved. Last year, for instance, Norfolk Southern teamed with Burlington Northern Sante Fe Corp., a major western railroad, to offer the first guaranteed, coast-to-coast rails service with money penalties if the shipments aren’t on schedule.

Equally important to Norfolk Southern’s future growth is another technology initiative known as Modalgistics. This suite of fee-based services includes modeling software to help customers control their inventory, optimize their supply chain and find the best combination of transportation modes en route to their product’s destination. It allows shippers to know where their rail cars are. “What they haven’t gotten from the railroads is revised estimated times of delivery if their shipment gets delayed. That’s what we’re trying to provide,” says David Lawson, president of Modalgistics, a division of Norfolk Southern. Lawson declined to provide specifics of how much money Modalgistics contributed to the bottom line last year, saying only that it was in the “tens of millions of dollars.”

The benefits of these new logistics-controls systems and streamlined operations are beginning to show up on the company’s balance sheet. For 2002, Norfolk Southern posted $460 million in profit, a 23-percent bump from 2001. Net income for the fourth quarter totaled $129 million, or 33 cents a share, beating analysts’ estimates by 3 cents. Revenue in its five general merchandise lines rose 5 percent, and an identical gain was made in intermodal freight - two key lines targeted by TOP. Coal revenue fell 2 percent, reflecting diminished demand by utility companies, but was more than offset by gains in autos and other cargoes. And while trucks still ship most freight, Norfolk Southern was able to divert $36 million from trucks to its merchandise rail last year.

Norfolk Southern has “to be good at this because there’s only so much coal and only so much grain, and most of it is already moved by rail where it makes any economic sense to do so,” says Walt Shuchmann, a transportation analyst with research firm R.L. Banks & Associates of Washington, D.C. “They can’t generate more demand for coal or grain, so what they have to do is enter the market for premium services. Both TOP and Modalgistics are ways to do it.”

Down the line, the 236 is making a special stop in Crewe to drop off Eubank. Before TOP, Crewe was a regular stop where a new train crew would take over. But Weeks and Gray will continue on to Norfolk. They are anxious to deliver their load so they can hole up for the night before catching a train to ride back to Roanoke. Before heading to Norfolk, though, they must brave sub-freezing temperatures for an ~hour or so for the more mundane tasks of checking axles, hot boxes and wheels. Technology may be helping Norfolk Southern become more efficient, but there are some traditional railroad problems it can’t solve.

Return to Virginia Business - March 2003


Virginia Business Online | Contact Us | E-mail the editor

©2007, Media General Operations Inc., publisher of Virginia Business.
Use of this website is subject to certain terms and conditions.