Virginia Business
Spacer
SEARCH
Spacer
NEWS CENTER
Spacer

December 2007

Home page
Current Issue
Past issues
Daily Headlines
Virginia Ideas
Editor's Blog
Spacer
TOP FEATURES
Spacer
Business Calendar
Virginia's Wealthiest
List of Leaders
Fantastic 50
Legal Elite
Super CPAs
Maritime Guide
Business Guide
Spacer
MARKET RESEARCH
Spacer
Regional Guides
Spacer
CLASSIFIEDS
Spacer
Jobs
VACommercial
Executive Services
Featured Ads
Spacer
CONTACT US
Spacer
Contact Us
Advertise With us
Planning Calendar
Subscribe
Spacer

Return to Virginia Business - July 2003

Editor's corner

News makes news

by Peter Galuszka
Virginia Business
July 2003


The news media has been much in the news. There have been controversies galore from loosening Federal Communications Commission rules regarding TV station ownership to scandal at The New York Times. So, if you will indulge me, I’ll weigh in with my views on several issues.

The complex FCC ruling has raised hackles from all sides. Opponents claim that it will only further concentrate power over the news into the hands of a few profit-oriented media giants. Not only would coverage and political opinion be more tightly controlled but arts and music would be mulled into inoffensive mush as big radio syndicates such as Clear Channel consolidate their control. Proponents of loosening the FCC rules include Media General, which owns this magazine and has done much with “converging” its company-owned TV, newspaper and multimedia operations in Tampa, Fla. These proponents argue that it is high time the 1970s-era rules were changed because there are many more outlets available on cable TV and the Internet.

The FCC has pleased very few. For its part, Media General isn’t happy because small-market TV stations are precluded from being purchased by newspaper owners in the same market. Opponents have flooded the FCC with half a million protesting e-mails.

In my view, large companies do have more monetary clout to improve and enhance essential news coverage than small company or small family-owned operations. Problems arise when the big companies become too fawning with Wall Street analysts and are too willing to sacrifice news-gathering resources to keep their already-high profit margins even higher. Everyone is served if consolidation means more money for more intelligent coverage. No one is served if the results are penny-pinching cutbacks that only divide up news gathering into ever-smaller slices that can be peddled across more platforms. After all, there are many examples out there that news organizations can be both business and editorial successes.

The New York Times fiction-writing scandal has brought the firing of upstart Jayson Blair and the resignations of hot-shot writer Rick Bragg, Executive Editor Howell Raines and Managing Editor Gerald Boyd. It has shaken up The Times’ imperial culture and raised questions about reverse racism by treating minorities with a more lenient hand.

My advice? Get over it. The Times remains the best newspaper in the U.S. It got that way through decades of hard work and corporate guts to put money into news. As for Blair, there are plenty (in fact nowhere near enough) of competent and honest minority journalists out there. Is The Times too liberal? Why not ask if The Wall Street Journal is too conservative? Who cares anyway? Both are essential reads for anyone doing business in today’s global market. Hopefully, readers have enough brains to detect supposed bias and move beyond it. Fact is, with either newspaper, one gets critically important information that no other news outlet provides. In this regard, smaller news outfits should try to be more like them, rather than less so.

Peter Galuszka
Executive Editor

Peter Galuszka

 

 

 

 

 

Return to Virginia Business - July 2003


Virginia Business Online | Contact Us | E-mail the editor

©2007, Media General Operations Inc., publisher of Virginia Business.
Use of this website is subject to certain terms and conditions.