|
Legal
Matters | Archive
Use of Confidentiality Agreements
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR |
Richard
Kay is a business attorney in the Richmond
offices of Executive Counsel PLC, a business
law firm that is composed primarily of
former corporate general counsel.
He can be reached at rkay@exec-counsel.com.
|
|
|
by Richard
Kay
for Virginia Business
October 1, 2007
Are you planning the sale of a business unit? Is a consultant
ready to advise you on a new marketing strategy? Perhaps
you are simply getting ready to have a technician come
upgrade your computers. This should make you pause. Whenever
a third party needs to see your company's secrets or
talk to your employees about a proprietary business matter,
that party will have access to private information.
The common way to protect company secrets is by using
a confidentiality agreement. Simply put, a confidentiality
agreement is a contract allowing the disclosure of private
proprietary information to a receiving party while protecting
the disclosing party from the misuse of that information.
You might think using such a formal agreement (sometimes
called an NDA, CDA or secrecy agreement) is overkill
in a routine day-to-day matter such as computer upgrades,
but without them, there is a greater likelihood your
information will be made public and your level of recourse
for divulged secrets is limited.
Whenever a visitor is at your business, he or she will
likely have access to a whole host of information - some
of which you intend to divulge, some perhaps not - regardless
of whether or not sensitive documents are to be reviewed
or systems examined. What the eyes take in and what the
ears overhear might be damaging to your business if made
public.
The simple layout of your production facility, the methods
of your security, the names of employees who are working
on a project, or any one of hundreds of other examples
may give your company an edge over your competitors and
contain information that you want to remain secret. Do
not assume that a salesman visiting your facility won't
share (intentionally or otherwise) what he sees or hears
with his other clients, and they might be your most direct
competitors. Each business has its own idiosyncrasies
that make it unique, and you should be as serious about
protecting those distinctive characteristics as you were
in developing them.
Many business owners tend to view confidentiality agreements
as routine and ordinary, and that one form is as good
as another. While most NDAs cover the same topics, the
wording often differs from document to document, and
what is stated and how it is stated is critical to how
information is protected. Read them carefully before
you sign.
When drafting or reviewing the agreement,
consider the following:
"Who are the parties to the
agreement (be sure to use the full legal names), and
which people within the organization can view the information?
"Should both parties be protecting
information, making a Mutual NDA necessary?
"What data or material should
be considered confidential (customers, employees, documents,
marketing materials, models, computer programs, drawings,
financial data and projections, business plans, other?).
How will that data be identified - must it be marked "confidential"to
be protected? Marking sounds like a good requirement,
but the process is often better in theory than in actual
practice, and a marking requirement won't protect the
unintended disclosures. Inserting a "reasonableness"standard
is sometimes the way to work around this stumbling block.
"Confidential information
can be written, spoken, or recorded, and the protected
materials should include all copies and reproductions.
"The fact that you are in
discussions with the third party might be something you
want kept confidential, especially in purchase and sale
negotiations. This should be added to the contract language.
"Limit the authorized use
of the confidential information to the purposes of the
agreement.
"If you will allow the third party to share the
information with its employees, must those employees
be bound to the exact same terms found in the NDA or
will you need different terms? Limit the scope to those
employees and others with an actual "need to know."
"Must the information be returned
or destroyed at the end of the discussions?
"Consider the duration of the
agreement - both how long the information must be kept
confidential and also how long the agreement will cover
future disclosures between the parties.
"Also, consider adding a provision
prohibiting the other side from soliciting your employees
for employment for a reasonable period of time.
There are many other issues to consider that are beyond
the scope of this article (damages, remedies, jurisdiction,
etc.), but remember to review all of the terms carefully.
Maintaining an adequate internal structure to control
the flow of company information to third parties is not
only common sense but an obligation, especially in this
post-Sarbanes-Oxley environment.
Most important, don't wait until the last minute to
present your NDA to the other side. Time might be an
ally or enemy, and you will want to control when the
sharing of information can start.
Present the other side with your
form - and don't automatically cave in to the other
side's demands that "our form
is the only document that our management allows."Both
parties have risks whenever signing a contract and the
enforcement of an NDA just might be as important as any
sales agreement you execute.
|