|
Legal
Matters | Archive
Ethics policies: It's just good business
ABOUT
THE AUTHOR
|
Dave
Faulders is a business attorney
in the Richmond offices of Executive Counsel,
PLC, a business law firm that is composed
primarily of former corporate general counsel.
He can be reached at dfaulders@exec-counsel.com.
Legal
Matters is written by the members
of the statewide law firm Executive Counsel
PLC. Most of the firm's members formerly
served as general counsel at large corporations.
They will rotate turns as columnists,
discussing a variety of legal issues
facing Virginia businesses.
Next
month: David Zerbee, from the
Fairfax office of Executive Counsel PLC
will discuss legal aspects of emergency
preparedness/disaster response.
|
|
|
|
by Dave
Faulders
for Virginia Business
September 2006
Are you concerned about the business reputation of your
company and its employees? What would happen to your
sales if your company is drawn into a scandal? Does everyone
in your organization know the company's standards of
behavior? These are basic and important questions that
every executive should address.
As most readers are aware, corporate
ethics has been a hot topic in recent years. If you
Google the term "Sarbanes
Oxley Act," or SOx, which was adopted in the wake
of scandals at Enron, WorldCom, Tyco and other companies,
as a regulatory effort to raise the bar for corporate
ethics, you will receive nearly 7 million hits. The term "conflicts
of interest" yields more than 16 million hits.
Among other things, SOx requires publicly traded companies
to have various ethics and conflicts-of-interest policies.
It does not require the same for private companies. Nevertheless,
ethics and conflicts-of -interest policies are essential
for all companies - even absent regulatory requirement
- for three important reasons.
First, these policies set forth expectations and requirements
for company employees. Not only is employee morale improved
when expectations are established and enforced, but also
the company benefits from greater protection in employee
disciplinary matters.
Second, having ethics and conflicts-of-interest
policies helps a company avoid or successfully defend
against
costly lawsuits. Written policies that are consistently
enforced can be a strong defense against many types of
actions, such as sexual harassment and insider trading.
Indeed, E. Norman Veasley, former chief justice of the
Delaware Supreme Court, has indicated that courts likely
will view conformance with SOx corporate governance principles
as the standard for "reasonable" corporate
behavior, whether or not the company is public. Finally, having these types of
policies is good business. Studies have shown that
there is a strong connection
between ethical behavior and marketplace dynamics. A
company that is deemed to be "ethically challenged" usually
faces lower sales and greater difficulty in working with
business partners, while one perceived to be ethical
creates dividends that go beyond legal issues and enhance
sales and employee morale.
An effective ethics policy should address the following
areas: • conflicts of interest;
• protection of corporate opportunities, including prohibitions
on executives taking personal advantage of opportunities
created as a result of their positions with the company;
• maintaining the confidentiality of non-public corporate
information;
• prohibitions on employees from taking unfair advantage
of anyone through unfair dealing practice;
• compliance with laws, rules and regulations; and
• employee reporting of any illegal or unethical behavior. Ethics and conflicts of interest policies, however,
are meaningless without the support of and enforcement
by the top executives in the organization. The people
at the top tend to set the climate and expectations that
fuel the behavior of employees. Here are several methods
that companies have used to create good ethical climates:
• Many companies conduct ethics
training and enforce the policies. Some companies require
employees periodically
to sign code-of-conduct statements. However, the policies
must not be viewed as window dressing as in the case
of Enron, where the board suspended the company's ethics
code to allow questionable partnerships that permitted
top executives to gain financially. • Some businesses promote
an ethical work atmosphere, along with salary, as a
way to woo top talent.
• Some companies periodically
survey employees to evaluate how well the company is
adhering to its code
of ethics. Their opinions are relayed to senior managers,
and shortcomings are promptly addressed.
• Some executives send a
clear message about their commitment to ethical conduct
by making business ethics
part of performance reviews.
• Some businesses use "hotlines" to
report, on a confidential basis, ethical lapses. When
Warren
Buffett's was hired as interim CEO of Salomon Brothers
after a bid-rigging scandal involving top executives,
he gave his managers his home phone number and told them
to call him if they saw anything unethical. Many managers
called Buffett, and they collectively came up with a
plan to rehabilitate Salomon's tarnished reputation.
While the vast majority of executives are ethical and
diligent in watching over ethical issues, many of them
are so busy it takes something like Enron to get their
attention and re-evaluate their policies to ensure they're
not guilty the same things. In the end, smart executives
realize that periodic evaluation of their ethics policies
leads to an honest, transparent and trustworthy culture
that bolsters employee morale and enhances shareholder
value.
--------------------------------------------- Dave Faulders is a business attorney in the Richmond
offices of Executive Counsel, PLC, a business law firm
that is composed primarily of former corporate general
counsel. He can be reached at dfaulders@exec-counsel.com.
|